Cellular One - Click for details!

Finding a partner is a challenge

By Duane A. Beyal
Navajo Times

WINDOW ROCK, Aug. 19, 2010

Text size: A A A  email this pageE-mail this story
Share |

Subscribe today to the Navajo Times print edition

When I was a young student at Church Rock Elementary, an activity our teachers forced us to do was learn different dances.

I say "forced" because most of us were shy kids from the old Church Rock Indian Village. Picking a partner to dance with was always the first and toughest hurdle.

This mostly happened in the winter months when we were kept indoors at recess time and lunch. So for physical activity, instead of sports in the gym we learned to waltz and dance country style.

As young kids we had to be pushed to pick a partner. Most times, the teacher would pick our partners for us.

No matter what age, 1st grade to 6th at Church Rock Elementary, there were always kids that took to the dancing easily and those who stubbornly resisted.

For we Church Rock kids the end of elementary meant we had to ride the bus to Gallup to start 7th grade. While dancing was not held as often as in elementary school, we occasionally had to face off with partners we liked or didn't like.

At Gallup High School, dancing became a little more serious. Not only was it enjoyable once you stopped playing the role of offended male or female, at this age you had to recognize that, like it or not, we had to live and work together.

Of course, some Casanovas jumped right in and some couples always danced together. For a small group of us, mostly Native Americans, both boys and girls, we chose to be stoic and stayed on our sides of the gym until the coaches forced us to pair up.

I was often paired with Angela or Doris and we tried to keep a steady, balanced waltz like the couples around us. The class lasted only 45 minutes and before you knew it the bell rang for the next class.

The days of being pushed and prodded in the back by a teacher towards a girl equally as unwilling as I was to get close came to mind as I attended the announcements by Lynda Lovejoy and Ben Shelly when they named their running mates on Aug. 9.

At Lovejoy's announcement, held at the Days Inn in St. Michaels, a conference room was filled with supporters and curious onlookers. It was standing room only when she announced her pick of Earl Tulley.

The crowd interrupted her speech with applause a few times, as well as Tulley's.

For Shelly's announcement, we had a heck of a time finding the time and location. First we couldn't find anyone who knew. Then it was the Quality Inn. Then the time kept changing. Then the location changed.

Finally the announcement was held late in the day at a private residence near Basha's here in Window Rock. A small group gathered, mostly friends and family, and four of us from the Navajo Times. We were the only news organization present, unlike Lovejoy's event that was attended by KTNN radio.

Shelly explained that they wanted to do it traditionally without a lot of fanfare. So while we waited, Shelly and Rex Lee Jim had some traditional doings in a hogan before emerging to stand on a small stage to make their statements.

Regardless of your opinion of Lovejoy's and Shelly's choices, we who have observed and reported on the Navajo Nation government in Window Rock for years know that these partnerships rarely last.

It is almost a tradition for a chairman and vice chairman or president and vice president to eventually disagree and part ways.

Will the 2010 running mates work well together? Will they be a team? Will we see harmony in the high office no matter who is elected?

Whoever wins, will we see them running against each other four years from now?

It is a tricky business to pick a political running mate. Kind of like forcing shy kids to dance.

Back to top ^

Comment Script

Comment on this

Politics and Healthcare
I really hope the Linda Lovejoy reforms the government. It's sad to see these council delegates scrambling to find other places to clench their teeth into (Fort Defiance Hospital).
#16 - Raen - 09/02/2010 - 17:30 | Report abuse
WHO TO VOTE FOR
Council Delegates: newcomers, and to those incumbents running against each other, seek ones that is making a difference in economic recovery (i.e., I vote for Bates over George Arthur). President: I'll vote for Lovejoy. Navajos may block her due to gender, but how many women are serving in public sector of government? A lot! Ben Shelly saw his time and produced practically nothing but the same old politics. Never an innovator, poor English usage, and can't understand/comprehend hard stuff.
#15 - REZZLYFF RAT - 09/02/2010 - 11:02 | Report abuse
No Change Navajo Politics
The Navajo Voters have no choice for leadership. It is their own fault for not taking a new direction. It will be the same "calibur" of people as usual. They need real leaders like Chris Deschene and others like him. But, you don't want to pay them what they are worth. It is no-wonder things don't change on the Navajo rez.
#14 - Navajo Observer - 08/29/2010 - 19:31 | Report abuse
Distorted pic makes distorted values
Amazing. Wally isn't voting for Lovejoy because he's against environmental activism. HAVE ANY of the coal, oil, uranium industries PROVIDED adequate jobs or compensation to the Dine' living within or near the lease areas? How are the lease negotiations conducted, closed or open? Are you employed by an "energy company? Present companies ARE NOT providing or negotiating in GOOD FAITH, they don't have to with folks like you distorting the picture.
#13 - Hogan by the Sea - 08/28/2010 - 11:18 | Report abuse
Values demonstrated
Is Tulley's selection an indicator of what Lovejoy values? If I recall correctly about 65 to 70% of the general fund comes from the extractive industries on the rez. Enters an activist that has a track record of speaking out against these industries; black mesa mine, Navajo Forest Product Industries, Desert Rock shut down. Rather than seeking real problem solving answers, he sought to shut down the revenue generators. Its the private sector that generates revenue, not the government. Sorry Lovejoy, you have lost my vote and support.
#12 - Wally Benally - 08/26/2010 - 20:17 | Report abuse
Values demonstrated
The selection of Tulley is this an indicator of what Lovejoy values? If I recall correctly about 65 to 70% of the general fund comes from the extractive industries on the rez. Enters an activist that has a track record of speaking out against these industries. Rather than seeking real problem solving answers, he sought to shut down the revenue generators. Its the private sector that generates revenue, not the government. Sorry Lovejoy, you have lost my vote and support.
#11 - Wally Benally - 08/26/2010 - 20:15 | Report abuse
make it rain!
i wish them the very best,because the u.s. government will teach them a new dance.
#10 - ooo g - 08/26/2010 - 16:25 | Report abuse
Shelly or Lovejoy?
Lovejoy doesn't care about the Navajo Nation! She just wants power and make history as the first "woman" President of the Navajo Nation.
Shelly doesn't know how to speak with the "real"
people in Wash. DC, he will embaress the Dine people!
I'm not voting!!!!
#9 - N E WAY... - 08/26/2010 - 10:24 | Report abuse
Disappointed in Lovejoy
I was shocked to read in NT that Lovejoy's statement of Mr. Tulley religious beliefs & family qualify him as a candidate. I frankly don't care about religious beliefs in fact good for him but how that qualifies him really baffles me.
The next set of candidates are equally as baffling.
I hate to say it, but I always thought Zah/Plummer got along well. I didn't know that they parted ways. Tachnii Scott where are you when we need 'educated' leaders.
I'm beginning to think the 'smart' Navajos long ago left the rez.
#8 - Kathy - 08/23/2010 - 14:27 | Report abuse
Dances and politics...fine combinations.
Duane, now the story on dances finally surfaced. There are stories going around during your early years of schooling, you always walked around with the shiningness belt buckle. LOL, now we know how that buckle got that shiny.

For us far away from the rez, we find the President/Vice President, on both sides, are not transparent at all. The websites are empty on issues, only plenty of pictures and reiterated speeches. Why?
#7 - Lew - 08/20/2010 - 08:54 | Report abuse
Start Previous Page
Name
E-mail (Will not appear online)
Title
Comment
;-) :-) :-D :-( :-o >-( B-) :oops: :-[] :-P
To prevent automated Bots from spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



TERMS OF USE
By submitting your comment, you agree to the following:
1. No personal attacks on non-public figures.
2. No swearing.
3. No explicit, pornographic, sexual references.
4. No malicious or libelous material. (In other words, be prepared to back up with facts.)
5. Do not write anything that you would be embarrassed to say to a room full of your most respected relatives and friends.



Back to top ^
Text size: A A A  email this pageE-mail this story